Skip to main content

Business intelligence and analytics

Let every number show its work.

Werkon builds reporting and analytics around the decision a person must make. Each number keeps its source, definition, grain, time, population, filters, quality, lineage, access, caveats, owner, and correction path attached.

Analytics contract

Define the decision, observation, and comparison together.

The contract starts with what a person must understand or decide, then defines the observations that can support it. Sources, grain, dimensions, measures, time, population, filters, quality, lineage, access, explanation, action, correction, and ownership move as one design.

Inputs

Decision and audience
Decision, action, user roles, current questions, cadence, thresholds, comparison, acceptable delay, uncertainty, consequences, escalation, explanation needs, devices, accessibility, exports, collaboration, and accountable decision owners.
Sources and observations
Authoritative systems and records, business events, identifiers, grain, entities, dimensions, hierarchies, measures, units, attributes, population, status, occurrence and validity time, corrections, reference data, and joins.
Definitions and quality
Metric formulas, inclusion and exclusion, filters, cohorts, allocation, currency and conversion, period close, provisional and final status, targets, benchmarks, completeness, uniqueness, consistency, timeliness, validity, accuracy, caveats, and owners.
Delivery and lifecycle
Pipelines, models, semantic layer, reports, dashboards, alerts, analysis tools, row and field access, refresh, cache, lineage, tests, reconciliation, usage, performance, support, definition change, versions, subscriptions, exports, retention, and retirement.

Outputs

Decision and evidence map
A traceable view of users, decisions, actions, questions, source records, observations, definitions, quality, comparisons, current manual reconciliation, access, interpretation risks, owners, and measures of useful adoption.
Versioned metric contract
Name, purpose, owner, grain, source, dimensions, measure, unit, time, population, formula, filters, exclusions, status, quality, lineage, access, thresholds, caveats, correction, version, and approved examples with test fixtures.
Decision-ready analytics slice
One governed question delivered through the simplest suitable report, dashboard, analysis, or alert with traceable records, accessible explanation, relevant comparison, exception visibility, reconciliation, and a clear next action.
Operations and lifecycle pack
Refresh, quality, lineage, reconciliation, access, performance, usage, alert, export, and support signals plus runbooks, correction, definition-change impact, consumer communication, audit, retention, ownership, and retirement evidence.

Analytics path

Resolve the metric before refining the chart.

The first useful slice should answer one recurring question with fewer reconciliation steps and clearer evidence. Visual form follows the decision, comparison, exception, accessibility, and action the user actually needs.

  1. 01

    Observe the decision and disagreement

    Follow who asks, calculates, reconciles, explains, approves, and acts; capture current reports and spreadsheets; identify conflicting definitions, hidden filters, missing exceptions, delay, quality concerns, and the cost of uncertain interpretation.

  2. 02

    Define observations and metric contracts

    Assign source authority, grain, dimensions, measures, units, time, population, formulas, filters, exclusions, quality, status, lineage, access, caveats, owners, and approved examples before building the view.

  3. 03

    Build the traceable semantic model

    Transform governed source records into reusable observations and metrics, preserve lineage and version, test calculations and joins against independent examples, reconcile meaningful totals and segments, and expose quality and freshness.

  4. 04

    Design the decision surface

    Choose table, chart, text, drill-down, detail, alert, or export from the comparison and action; preserve context, units, labels, focus, keyboard, responsive behavior, status, caveats, exceptions, and a path back to records where allowed.

  5. 05

    Validate, release, and evolve

    Test with representative users and records, compare independent calculations, review accessibility and interpretation, stage subscriptions and alerts, monitor use and quality, correct errors, communicate definition changes, and retire unused or superseded views.

Analytics form

Choose the smallest form that supports the decision.

The same governed observations can support several forms, but each adds different operating responsibilities. Frequency, variability, interactivity, explanation, audience, action, delivery channel, and change ownership should determine the form.

01A defined record set needs review

Operational report

Use a table or scheduled report when users need a complete, sortable, exportable, auditable set of records, statuses, exceptions, or period results rather than an abstract visual summary.

Evidence: Audience and cadence, record grain, columns and definitions, sort and grouping, filters, cutoff and status, totals, quality notes, access, export control, reconciliation, and owner.

02A recurring comparison needs context

Managed metric dashboard

Use a dashboard when a stable audience repeatedly compares a small set of governed measures across time, segment, target, or threshold and can take an identified action from the view.

Evidence: Decision and action, metric contracts, comparison, dimensions, target authority, refresh, quality and caveats, accessible chart and table alternatives, drill-down, usage, and owner.

03The question is not stable yet

Exploratory analysis

Use analysis when the purpose is to investigate patterns, segments, hypotheses, outliers, or possible explanations before promoting a result into a maintained metric or product surface.

Evidence: Question and method, data and population, transformations, code or query, assumptions, uncertainty, sensitivity, alternative explanations, reproducibility, reviewer, limitations, and next decision.

04Timing changes the response

Alert or decision support

Use an alert or embedded recommendation when a bounded condition requires timely attention, while keeping thresholds, suppression, identity, authority, false positives, escalation, acknowledgement, correction, and fallback explicit.

Evidence: Trigger definition, source and latency, threshold rationale, recipient and authority, rate and suppression, context, action options, acknowledgement, audit, false-result review, escalation, and recovery.

Metric controls

Keep every comparison attached to its population and time.

Many analytics disagreements are structurally valid calculations over different observations. A governed result makes grain, dimensions, status, filters, version, and quality visible enough to distinguish a real change from a different question.

One contract owns each metric version
Assign the purpose, owner, formula, source, grain, dimensions, unit, time, population, exclusions, quality, status, caveats, access, examples, effective date, and change history. Different versions should not share one unlabeled name.
Comparison context stays visible
Show time zone, period, cutoff, unit, currency, scale, cohort, filter, denominator, target source, provisional status, missing data, suppressed values, and relevant base rates so a chart does not invite a comparison the data cannot support.
Quality and caveats travel with the result
Expose freshness, expected and received records, important quality dimensions, systematic missingness, transformations, corrections, known limitations, and how to report an issue rather than isolating caveats in separate documentation.
Views and exports preserve access rules
Apply server-side row and field authority, purpose and tenant scope, least privilege, safe aggregation, suppression where required, controlled sharing and subscriptions, protected caches, export limits, audit, revocation, retention, and deletion.

Engagement fit

Use business intelligence and analytics when recurring decisions need shared, traceable evidence.

Good reason to begin

  • Teams repeatedly reconcile reports, spreadsheets, dashboards, definitions, and source systems before they can make an operational, financial, product, commercial, or risk decision.
  • Decision owners, metric owners, source and data owners, users, finance or domain reviewers, security, privacy, accessibility, and support can resolve definitions and permitted use.
  • Authoritative records, transformations, current outputs, representative data or safe synthetic alternatives, quality issues, user workflows, and reconciliation examples can be inspected.
  • The organization is prepared to retire duplicate metrics and reports, communicate definition changes, correct published errors, maintain access and quality, and measure whether the output is actually used.

Resolve before beginning

  • The desired dashboard is expected to create source authority, settle disputed business rules, repair missing records, or replace accountable decision ownership without upstream change.
  • The initiative depends on broad ungoverned access, hidden cross-tenant data, copied production records without lawful controls, misleading aggregation, or consequential actions without server-side authority and recovery.
  • No owner can approve grain, population, definitions, targets, quality thresholds, caveats, access, corrections, or retirement, and every disagreement is expected to become another metric version.
  • The requested outcome is predictive or causal certainty from descriptive reporting, or a guaranteed business result from correlation and visualization alone.

Source basis

Sources behind the control model.

  • 01

    World Wide Web Consortium

    The RDF Data Cube Vocabulary

    The stable W3C Recommendation models statistical observations through explicit dimensions, measures, attributes, units, code lists, slices, and reusable data-structure definitions so consumers can interpret and validate multidimensional data.

  • 02

    World Wide Web Consortium

    PROV-O: The PROV Ontology

    The stable W3C Recommendation defines interoperable provenance concepts for entities, activities, agents, generation, use, derivation, and responsibility that can keep analytical outputs traceable to their production history.

  • 03

    UK Government Data Quality Hub

    The Government Data Quality Framework Guidance

    The guidance ties quality rules and metrics to user needs and business objectives, recommends communicating caveats and lifecycle changes, and treats completeness, uniqueness, consistency, timeliness, validity, and accuracy as context-dependent dimensions.

[ WORKFLOW / SYSTEMS AUDIT ]
THE FIRST ENGAGEMENT

Start with one real workflow

A Systems Audit is the usual starting point. If the opportunity is already clear, we can move directly into a focused build.

Show Us the WorkflowStart with the free automation readiness checklist

OBSERVEQUANTIFYDECIDEBUILD