Skip to main content

Specialist capability map

Find the responsibility before the role title.

A useful hiring brief begins with the work that is not covered, the decisions the person must make, and the team they must join. Werkon uses that context to define a role, seniority, screening evidence, collaboration model, and an honest availability check.

Role map

Start with the discipline, then narrow by context and responsibility.

The categories below organize a hiring conversation. They help identify adjacent disciplines and screening needs, but they do not promise a person, location, rate, or start date.

0113 capability categories

AI and data

Define the work across data foundations, analysis, models, evaluation, production integration, reliability, governance, and decision support.

  • AI engineering
  • Data architecture
  • Business intelligence
0217 capability categories

Cloud, DevOps and infrastructure

Cover the path from environments and delivery automation to cloud architecture, reliability, identity, networks, databases, support, and recovery.

  • Cloud engineering
  • Site reliability
  • Infrastructure as code
0310 capability categories

Backend and full-stack

Match product and platform responsibilities to engineers who can work across APIs, services, data models, integrations, established systems, and maintainable delivery.

  • Node.js
  • Python web
  • .NET and C#
046 capability categories

Frontend

Specify interface architecture, product behavior, accessibility, responsive systems, performance, testing, and the framework context that already shapes the application.

  • React
  • Angular
  • HTML and CSS
0513 capability categories

Mobile, embedded and interactive

Separate native or cross-platform mobile work from devices, firmware, connected systems, robotics, simulation, and real-time interactive products.

  • iOS and Android
  • Embedded systems
  • Game engines
0618 capability categories

Product, delivery, quality and security

Connect discovery, product direction, design, delivery leadership, testing, reliability evidence, defensive controls, and authorized security review.

  • Product management
  • Quality engineering
  • Security architecture

Capability brief

Turn the gap into evidence that can be screened.

A role request becomes useful when the team can describe the work, the decisions, the surrounding system, the level of independence, and what credible evidence would look like.

  1. 01

    Name the uncovered responsibility

    Describe the outcomes, decisions, backlog, operational duties, risks, and current owner instead of beginning with a technology label.

  2. 02

    Set context and seniority

    Clarify the existing team, architecture, users, constraints, authority, ambiguity, communication needs, and how independently the person must operate.

  3. 03

    Define screening evidence

    Choose proportionate evidence such as work discussion, code or artifact review, a bounded practical exercise, system reasoning, references, or verified credentials when required.

  4. 04

    Confirm model and availability

    Agree who directs the work, expected collaboration, timing, access, security, commercial constraints, and whether suitable capability is actually available for the engagement.

Hiring boundaries

A category is a search path, not a candidate claim.

The role architecture makes the request clearer. It does not replace a current availability check, evidence-based screening, or an engagement-specific decision about fit.

No fictional inventory
A published role category does not mean Werkon has a named person waiting, operates in a particular region, or can promise a start date. Those facts must be confirmed when the request is known.
Tools are supporting evidence
Framework or platform experience matters when the work requires it, but it does not by itself prove system judgment, communication, reliability, or ownership of the responsibility.
Seniority is contextual
A senior title should correspond to the ambiguity, decision authority, technical breadth, leadership, and operating responsibility required in this team, not only years worked.
Consequential work is scoped
Security testing must be authorized. Compliance and regulated work require the right specialist authority. Production, data, and safety access must be narrow, deliberate, and reviewable.

Verified role guides

Browse role pages only after their evidence is complete.

This catalog grows as each role receives current primary research, an explicit responsibility and assessment model, a page-specific visual, technical checks, and real browser review. A published guide remains a capability definition, not a claim of a waiting person.

01

AI and data

Roles for production AI, data platforms, analytics, models, evaluation, pipelines, architecture, and decision support, each separated from its adjacent responsibilities.

02

Cloud, DevOps and infrastructure

Roles for software delivery, cloud platforms, infrastructure, reliability, security, databases, systems and operations, each tied to explicit authority and recovery evidence.

03

Backend and full-stack

Roles for services, APIs, integrations and product systems, each tied to explicit contracts, data effects, delivery evidence, operation, recovery and compatible evolution.

04

Frontend

Roles for accessible product interfaces, semantic interaction, browser behavior, state, responsive systems, testing, performance and maintainable delivery.

05

Mobile, game, and embedded

Roles for device-aware products, native and cross-platform interfaces, embedded constraints, game runtimes, connectivity, testing, distribution, performance, and lifecycle ownership.

06

Product and delivery

Roles for product direction, analysis, research, design, facilitation, planning, risk, coordination, delivery evidence, and accountable learning.

07

Quality and security

Roles for compliance, assurance, adversarial testing, product quality, defensive operations, secure architecture, and software test evidence.

[ WORKFLOW / SYSTEMS AUDIT ]
THE FIRST ENGAGEMENT

Start with one real workflow

A Systems Audit is the usual starting point. If the opportunity is already clear, we can move directly into a focused build.

Show Us the WorkflowStart with the free automation readiness checklist

OBSERVEQUANTIFYDECIDEBUILD